<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Sumit Chachra&#039;s Blog &#187; revision control</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.chachra.us/tag/revision-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.chachra.us</link> <description>Tivix, Technology, Django, Startups, Social Media</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 05:31:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>On project management, bug/issue tracking and source control</title><link>http://blog.chachra.us/2010/03/04/on-project-management-bugissue-tracking-and-source-control/</link> <comments>http://blog.chachra.us/2010/03/04/on-project-management-bugissue-tracking-and-source-control/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Sumit Chachra</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software Industry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bug Tracking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Project management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[revision control]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chachra.us/?p=74</guid> <description><![CDATA[There seems to be a big disconnect between project management, bug/issue tracking and source control solutions out there. Simply put in most companies these systems don&#8217;t talk to each other as much as they should.
How have I solved the problem. I&#8217;m using bitbucket.org for source control that talks nicely with LighthouseApp which I use mainly [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>There seems to be a big disconnect between <a
class="zem_slink" title="Project management" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_management">project management</a>, bug/issue tracking and <a
class="zem_slink" title="Revision control" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revision_control">source control</a> solutions out there. Simply put in most companies these systems don&#8217;t talk to each other as much as they should.</p><p>How have I solved the problem. I&#8217;m using <a
href="bitbucket.org" target="_blank">bitbucket.org</a> for source control that talks nicely with <a
href="http://lighthouseapp.com" target="_blank">LighthouseApp</a> which I use mainly for <a
class="zem_slink" title="Bug tracking system" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bug_tracking_system">bug-tracking</a> (Milestones feature is nice&#8230; but only for bigger teams).</p><p>We don&#8217;t really use anything for project management per se, although we do use <a
href="http://highrisehq.com/" target="_blank">Highrise</a> as our <a
class="zem_slink" title="Customer relationship management" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer_relationship_management">CRM</a> system and it has a cool, &#8220;Cases&#8221; feature. So lets say we&#8217;re doing a site redesign I  create a new case and upload all relevant assets  / discussions to that case. Highrise comes with awesome email integration, so each case gets a unique email address and I can fwd emails to it, and they get attached to the case automagically. I think <a
href="http://basecamphq.com/" target="_blank">BaseCamp</a> is for dedicated project management, but for now I can live with leveraging Highrise features.</p><div
class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span
class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.chachra.us/2010/03/04/on-project-management-bugissue-tracking-and-source-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Mercurial Hosting that rocks &#8211; www.bitbucket.org/</title><link>http://blog.chachra.us/2008/10/23/mercurial-hosting-that-rocks-wwwbitbucketorg/</link> <comments>http://blog.chachra.us/2008/10/23/mercurial-hosting-that-rocks-wwwbitbucketorg/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:39:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Sumit Chachra</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bitbucket]]></category> <category><![CDATA[customer satisfaction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hg]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hosted]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mercurial]]></category> <category><![CDATA[revision control]]></category> <category><![CDATA[saas]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chachra.us/?p=71</guid> <description><![CDATA[So I started a new gig this week, and I have become addicted to using Mercurial in my previous job for revision control of code. Mercurial rocks !
I didn&#8217;t really want to host the repository myself and have the additional headache of backing it up etc. (we&#8217;re a small early stage startup). I used Assembla [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>So I started a new gig this week, and I have become addicted to using <a
href="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/">Mercurial</a> in my previous job for revision control of code. Mercurial rocks !</p><p>I didn&#8217;t really want to host the repository myself and have the additional headache of backing it up etc. (we&#8217;re a small early stage startup). I used Assembla before, and its very mediocre, tries to offer everything and is using .htaccess based authentication, making me type my username and password multiple times, doesn&#8217;t support the native mercurial web view, offers trac for ticketing which sucks&#8230; etc. etc.</p><p>Then I came across <a
href="http://www.bitbucket.org/">BitBucket</a>. These guys rock! Firstly its an inexpensive service to host your mercurial repositories; I will end up paying $5/month for hosting my dev/prod (upto 5) repositories with them. They offer issue tracking too (for which I am using <a
href="http://lighthouseapp.com/">LightHouse app</a>). The mercurial integration is pretty deep, offers hooks which can send you emails, twitter, link to your bug tracking system etc. And its hosted so I don&#8217;t have to worry about backing it up, uptime, security/auth etc.</p><p>A shout out to BitBucket&#8217;s customer service. I am not even a paying customer yet (using the free version for now, till I need a &#8220;prod&#8221; repository) and they have been trying to resolve my complaints. For example I filed <a
href="http://www.bitbucket.org/jespern/bitbucket/issue/310/broker-for-lighthouse-app">this</a> enhancement request with them, asking them to writer me a broker to close/update my issues in Lighthouse app when I merge bugs etc. Turnaround time? &lt; 1 day ! Their developer Jesper Noehr went out of his way, fixed a few bugs he inadvertently put into the broker code, launched the fixes and the feature overnight, and voila I have this feature out of the box.</p><p>Wish every company (hoping mine will be in this category too, when we launch!) had such good customer satisfaction! Thanks BitBucket and thanks Jesper!</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.chachra.us/2008/10/23/mercurial-hosting-that-rocks-wwwbitbucketorg/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>35</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 21/38 queries in 0.055 seconds using disk

Served from: blog.chachra.us @ 2010-07-31 17:12:31 -->