It was a long time coming! Yahoo! chose to use Flash (Flex?) to build the online version of messenger. Will I use it, probably on my personal laptop at home (one less piece of desktop software to install… phew!). Does it even come close to the Gtalk that comes integrated with Gmail (launched more than a year back)? Not for me, but I can imagine people who would want all the bells and whistles of their regular desktop messenger (fonts, text size, bold/italic etc.) to like the new Yahoo! Web Messenger. Some of my comments on this new products and ways to improve it:

History: So finally I can see my chat history. But why not give a search box right at the top instead of making me click on a link? Pretty basic interaction designer stuff I assume? Instead a web search box is provided at the top.

Cntrl-W / Cntrl-G / Cntrl-Tab: None of these nice shortcuts works. Cntrl-W should close my current chat tab, Cntrl-G should let me buzz my friends (my friends can buzz me, but my window doesn’t vibrate!) and Cntrl-Tab should let me move between chat tabs, just like I can on my Firefox (or at least Tab like the way it does in the Gmail/Gtalk)

Copying multiple lines: Doesn’t work. Only one line at a time. Thats pretty lame.

Banner ad on the right: Was it very essential to put that ugly banner ad on the right, specially when a new product like this launches? If I were the Product Manager on the web messenger team, I’d instead match (and rotate every 10 minutes or less) text ads related to my past/current chats. I’d bet this would increase CTR significantly. Irrespective its worth an experiment for sure. Simple bucket test to conduct.

Login popup: Why does a new popup window need to be opened to make my login? Its a very jarred user experience, different from every other Yahoo! property I’ve used before.

Gmail has been down for me for the last couple of hours, out here in India. Anyone else facing this downtime too? I’m getting the following message:

Temporary Error (502)
We’re sorry, but your Gmail account is currently experiencing errors. You won’t be able to log in while these errors last, but don’t worry, your account data and messages are safe. Our engineers are working to resolve this issue.

Please try logging in to your account again in a few minutes.

I wouldn’t really call more than 2 hours “temporary”. Someone missed their SLA targets!

UPDATE 1: Its weird, I get the following error now (choosing the HTML view does open up my inbox… its broken though since I have no vertical scrollbars?!?):

Loading…

This seems to be taking longer than usual.

If you are using a slow Internet connection, you can wait a bit longer for this page to finish loading, or just use basic HTML view for now.

If you are using your normal Internet connection and you usually get past this loading step without any problems, please refresh this page in your browser. If you continue to have trouble loading your account, please visit the help center for troubleshooting information.

UPDATE 2: Its finally up after a 4-5 hour outage!

UPDATE 3: Its been 5 days since I wrote this post. But as can be seen from the comments below (and the traffic I am getting to this post), people are still facing this issue with their gmail accounts (I am not). This seems to be a user specific access issue, rather than a mass outage. It might be that gmail is performing some system/software upgrades. Being patient is the only way out! I did not lose any of my emails/data, so don’t see a need to be concerned as of now.

Previously I wrote about Google Calendar and Gmail improvements, here and here respectively. In this post I gives more product ideas for Google Reader and iGoogle (Seriously why doesn’t Google have a URL like http://igoogle.com or http://igoogle.google.com for it ?? Thats the first thing someone would try the moment they hear Google has launched… err re-branded something to “iGoogle”):

Google Reader

search and auto-filter: Search has been the most asked feature for all GReader users out there. I’d like to see a general blogosphere search (similar to Google Blog Search) built into GReader and a search box specific to the feeds I subscribe too. The auto-filter feature would enable me to save some wildcard searches that would remove matching entries. This would be great since for example I hate reading blog entries about everyone’s del.icio.us bookmarks etc.

- Easy “mark read”: I treat my feed entries in GReader like emails in Gmail. But sadly GReader lacks the archive capability. I’d like to see a easy (one-click) way of marking entries as “don’t read”. These are entries I don’t want to open (since after reading the one line snippet I know that its not worth my time), but don’t want to make the effort of opening them and hence marking them as read. Cause of the sheer slowness of this process (and the fact that I don’t want to mark things as having been read, when its not the case) what ends up happening is that I have a bunch of entries that are unread and clutter my view

- Better auto-sort: I know this feature is sort of in beta, so I’d like to make a few suggestions on how to improve it. So whats wrong with it? The relevance of this feature is for the top 10-20 posts only. Beyond that it starts clustering posts from the same feed in some random cluster size of 4-8 posts. Visually seeing such a pattern, anyone can realize its far from intelligent. I’m sure the GReader team is thinking of using the page rank/starring/subscription/read count of feeds/feed entries etc. to come up with some kind of ranking (apart from posting frequency which I don’t think is the best measure; at least not when its used in isolation). If they can implement the “mark read” feature mentioned above, then they would have an additional measure to use and the read count spurious behavior (I manually mark all del.icio.us entries as “read” to force them to go away) would go away too

- Add to Google: My experience with adding feeds to GReader is less than ideal. For example clicking on the “Add to Google” button on the Official Google Blog leads users to this page. Now the problem with this page is clicking on “Add to Google Reader” actually opens up GReader again (again cause I usually already have it opened). I’d rather make this adding procedure quick and snappy with the ability to add labels etc. and a link to GReader. I usually add new feeds cause my readings on GReader lead me to one, hence the situation where I already have an instance of GReader open.

iGoogle

- Variable width/height for each category: Giving the ability to widen/shrink the width/height of widgets would be great. For example I have 24″ monitors at work and my stock module (which Google calls “stuff”!) has the stock ticker and price/moment etc. too far apart.

- Mobile Version issues: I like the fact that iGoogle has a mobile version. I have 3 issues with it though. One being the fact that I can only add a limited set of modules to my mobile version. Secondly any module I want to add to my mobile version of iGoogle needs to be on my web version too…. for example I don’t want a GReader module on my web version, but on my mobile one!? Lastly I’d prefer not having pagination on the mobile version… or at least not after 3-4 modules only. When I want a quick glance at all my modules, I don’t really want to make an additional click to get to my other modules (mobile interfaces/data speeds are not conducive to excessive user interaction).

My first post on Google Calendar improvements can be found here. In this post I focus on Gmail:

Spam Sort: Gmail spam detection is great, but I’ve had an occasional mail or two marked as spam; when they were really meant for my reading pleasure! For anyone who gets a few thousand spam messages a week (I do), its a pain to have a glance at all of them and try and make sure nothing non-spammy has gotten in. What I’m suggesting is a section within the spam label, that lists emails to me, that were on the borderline for being marked as spam. A 0-10 ranking would be even better, but I guess a binary label would be better, so as not to give the secret sauce (some advanced Bayesian Filtering) behind Gmail spam filtering.

Viewing big messages: By big I really mean long. For anyone who gets emails with thousands of lines in them (code reviews anyone?) this is a great feature. If your email is too long, Gmail gives you a link at the bottom saying “View entire message”, clicking which opens another window with the entire email contents. The problem with this is that if you want to reply to that email with inline comments, you’ve to open it its entirety, copy the email contents, paste them back in gmail and then type your reply. You of course lose all the nice indentation etc., plus this is a real pain cause the new window that was opened has a the Google logo and other HTML and selecting a few thousand lines without that is a pain! Hence I suggest having a “no clipping” option for long emails (if I’m willing for the nifty gmail AJAX to take a while loading my message… so be it!). Or possibly a simpler solution (from a development perspective) would be to have a reply option in the new window thats opened for viewing the entire message.

Attach notes to emails: I’d like the ability to write notes associated with email threads/specific emails in the thread. This would be in addition to being able to label/star messages. These notes should be part of my Gmail index and automatically appear in my Google notebook (with a special gmail label) with links back to the appropriate email thread/email in my gmail inbox. I’d say notes should be allowed on more Google apps (currently on Calendar only… but these don’t appear in notebook), hence Google notebook becoming an even more central part of my daily routine, a one stop place to see all my notes, not only ones I explicitly typed in there!

Quoted text: Gmail automatically recognizes text that has been quoted from a previous email in an email thread. This is a great feature since it saves me time, in terms of being able to see new text written by someone and not see old contents. But sometimes I’d wish all the quoted text be shown with a single click (instead of me having to click “Show quoted text” 10 times in an email). This definitely is low hanging fruit cause it would take 2 minutes from a JavaScript developer to code!