<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Of browser bookmarks and delicious</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.chachra.us/2006/06/24/of-browser-bookmarks-and-delicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.chachra.us/2006/06/24/of-browser-bookmarks-and-delicious/</link> <description>Tivix, Technology, Django, Startups, Social Media</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Sumit</title><link>http://blog.chachra.us/2006/06/24/of-browser-bookmarks-and-delicious/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link> <dc:creator>Sumit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:57:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chachra.us/?p=41#comment-98</guid> <description>Couldn&#039;t agree with you more Aneil. Give Yahoo! some more time and am sure it will figure out how to leverage and intergrate delicious in a manner that the regular user can also start using it! :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more Aneil. Give Yahoo! some more time and am sure it will figure out how to leverage and intergrate delicious in a manner that the regular user can also start using it! <img
src='http://blog.chachra.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aneil Weber</title><link>http://blog.chachra.us/2006/06/24/of-browser-bookmarks-and-delicious/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link> <dc:creator>Aneil Weber</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 18:06:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chachra.us/?p=41#comment-97</guid> <description>Sumit,I’m pretty much the same way with delicious vs. bookmarks but one thing I’d mention here is that most people still don’t have any clue what delicious is.  We have developed patterns and uses out of delicious vs bookmarks, but most of the market has not.  This is actually a little scary for delicious because since the masses know Google and know favorites, they are developing their own usage patterns which will be aided by Google sync (once they figure out that firefox exists).  I see it more as a race than “this versus that” when it comes to the widespread adoption of social bookmarks.  That being said, delicious does a much better job than Google notebook does and between the two I’d definitely pick delicious.  Time will tell which one wins but delicious has got to get into the mainstream a bit faster.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sumit,</p><p>I’m pretty much the same way with delicious vs. bookmarks but one thing I’d mention here is that most people still don’t have any clue what delicious is.  We have developed patterns and uses out of delicious vs bookmarks, but most of the market has not.  This is actually a little scary for delicious because since the masses know Google and know favorites, they are developing their own usage patterns which will be aided by Google sync (once they figure out that firefox exists).  I see it more as a race than “this versus that” when it comes to the widespread adoption of social bookmarks.  That being said, delicious does a much better job than Google notebook does and between the two I’d definitely pick delicious.  Time will tell which one wins but delicious has got to get into the mainstream a bit faster.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 18/28 queries in 0.056 seconds using disk

Served from: blog.chachra.us @ 2010-07-31 17:00:53 -->